Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 101 - 120 of 983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In contrast the System's board-certified orthopedic surgeon conducted an independent medical examination of Trooper and after a physical examination of Trooper, a review of his medical records and consideration of Trooper's "subjective complaints" opined that Trooper is not permanently disabled or incapable of performing the duties of a state trooper.In response to Trooper's contention that the hearsay evidence… [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Civil Service Commission’s jurisdictional reclassification of 29 titles to the noncompetitive class violated Article V, §6’s merit and fitness mandateMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
Goodman).Similarity of the goods and trade channels/consumers: Examining Attorney Mark S. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:12 pm
A similar requirement exists in Connecticut, and it's the subject of that state's Supreme Court's decision in Morgan et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
Texas Medical Board, a Fifth Circuit case involving the antitrust state-action immunity doctrine. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
WCAB (Workers' Compensation Appeal Board), the Independent Medical Examiner (IME, otherwise known as Defense Medical Examiner (DME)), released the injured worker to full time work. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
The Board is not called upon to decide whether the Examining Division was or was not correct in this matter, but merely to decide whether the Examining Division arrived at this conclusion in a reasonable way.6.3 The Board can accept that the Examining Division faced the difficulty that the Guidelines do not define what "sufficiently substantiated" means in the case of illness. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
The Board is not called upon to decide whether the Examining Division was or was not correct in this matter, but merely to decide whether the Examining Division arrived at this conclusion in a reasonable way.6.3 The Board can accept that the Examining Division faced the difficulty that the Guidelines do not define what "sufficiently substantiated" means in the case of illness. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 10:00 am by Comitz Stanley
Pogue was legally, not factually, disabled because the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners had suspended Dr. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:35 pm by Joseph Lazzarotti
This fact has been highlighted in decisions from courts throughout the country, as well as decisions by state boards of medical examiners, including those summarized above. [read post]