Search for: "State v. Jeffrey T. M."
Results 101 - 120
of 471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Gomez, Brad T. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Plus it's in state court, which means he likely gets out in two and a half. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
On September 2, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in John Haight et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 5:07 pm
Also, in a parallel case (Malandrucco v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:21 am
For example, in his account of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Goldstein of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and publisher of SCOTUSblog; Deborah Jones Merritt, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law at Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University (court-appointed amicus in Reed Elsevier); Jeffrey M. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:26 am
Jeffrey doesn't seem to have challenged the first two elements. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
Judge Jeffrey M. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
(Just to be clear: I’m not surprised.) [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:07 am
Hayes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 7:47 am
With the addition of conservative Justice Neil M. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:07 pm
“I don’t think I’m the favorite of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am
We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Sherry M. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The Dubious Data of Wisconsin v. [read post]
