Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am
The post Case Preview: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:18 pm
Beast Six Six Six Lord v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Kerr is critical of affording the state a margin of appreciation where it has not properly evaluated the issues at stake. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick’s favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.The case is a canonical statement of the common law’s commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:27 pm
Click Here for PDF In Richards v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
In Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79, Lord Carnwath offered some important observations on the duty to give reasons in administrative law. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:27 am
Successor to polluter not liable under later law Regina (National Grid Gas plc) v Environment Agency House of Lords “A private company which had succeeded the state-owned British Gas in 1986 was not liable under legislation enacted in 1995 for the cost of removing contamination from land at a former gasworks which had been sold for housing in 1965. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
” (iv) Financial Independence and s 117B(3) Characterising Ms Rhuppiah’s case as “a good example of the sometimes flimsy distinction between employment and third party support”, Lord Wilson took the view that “financial independence” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 12:29 am
Press), examines the 1963 case, Abington v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones found that B’s situation fell into the category of case Lord Dyson had in mind in Lumba where a person’s detention pending deportation ceases to be lawful no matter how grave the risk of absconding or the risk of serious offending. [read post]
