Search for: "State v. Polk"
Results 101 - 120
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
DECISION OF COURT OF APPEALS VACATED; DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.No. 11–0156 STATE OF IOWA v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
A crash occurred in Polk County on November 24, 2010VEH 1 WAS NORTHBOUND ON HWY 17, VEH 2 WAS SOUTHBOUND ON HWY 17LOST CONTROL DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS, ENTERED NORTHBOUND LANESCOLLIDING HEAD ON WITH V ... [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Fenrich of Davis Polk & Wardwell presented the defense position. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
First, this blog by the “Activist Investor” stated a belief that CEOs shouldn’t serve on the board at all, much less serve as the board chair. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
Some titles, like The Book of American Presidents (1939) by Esse V. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
State, 744 A.2d 864, 887 (Vt. 1999)] and New Jersey [Lewis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Exeter Law Group LLP v Immortalana Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:44 pm
V, § 14, Fla. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 2:14 pm
From Judge Katherine Polk Failla (S.D.N.Y.) last week in Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
After Dismissal Court Lacked Subject-matter Jurisdiction Magloire v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:32 am
Exeter Law Group LLP v Immortalana Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
” “An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479, 482; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:33 am
Shakespeare in fact also employs this meaning of “fair” as when Hector in Act 5, scene 3 of Troilus and Cressida states “O, ’tis fair play”. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
Polk v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
"Plaintiff has stated a cause of action for legal malpractice by alleging that "but for" defendant's failure to prepare and procure documents necessary to provide him with a first-priority security interest, he would have been able to recover the amounts owed to him by the defaulting borrower (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:00 am
STATE OF IOWAAppeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Carla T. [read post]