Search for: "State v. Rodgers"
Results 101 - 120
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am
In US v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:26 am
Rodgers v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
(The stay application is Stroup, et al., v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
MSCHF appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
MSCHF appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm
Practices Assocs. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Rodgers, 133 S.Ct. at 1451. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
This is intended to limit the effect of Thomas v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Rodgers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
