Search for: "State v. Romano" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st… [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Author
Circuit’s exacting standard of review in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am by Susan Brenner
The Defendant cites two state court cases, McMillen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
; Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property and State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the New York Convention of 2004. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As far as securities and the economy in general are concerned, once Wickard v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Kathryn Moore analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Culbertson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
Musk[3] (striking Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package at Tesla), West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
The individual certainly cannot travel to the United States and travel elsewhere in the world risks detention and possible extradition to the United States. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
In this case , Romano v Ficchi , 2009 NY Slip Op 51011(U) , Decided on May 22, 2009 , Supreme Court, Kings County , Rivera, J. plaintiff sought to buy a condo with a view. [read post]