Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 101 - 120 of 3,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 4:02 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Courts of AppealiNews Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from Wesleyan University Press: Prudence Crandall’s Legacy: The Fight for Equality in the 1830s, Dred Scott, and Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Taken together, the chapters trace the narrative arc of school desegregation in the United States, beginning in California in the 1940s, continuing through Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
  The Circuit Court affirmed the Board’s decision with respect to the single subject holding but reversed the Board’s decision with respect to the equal protection holding. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:45 am
Ferguson decision, which had allowed for "separate but equal" public facilities, including public schools in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Padilla, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court held that California’s statute requiring women on corporate boards violates the state constitution’s equal protection clause. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
Padilla II that the California Equal Protection Clause rendered unconstitutional a law requiring California publicly listed corporations to have board members from “underrepresented communities. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
Padilla II that the California Equal Protection Clause rendered unconstitutional a law requiring California publicly listed corporations to have board members from “underrepresented communities. [read post]