Search for: "Taylor v. Georgia"
Results 101 - 120
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of Daryanani v Ramnani ([2017] EWHC 183 (QB)). [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:34 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:38 am
Fields v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:40 am
Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am
Taylor, 2016 U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
Compare Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Cain, 14-10008 (presenting questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel); and Taylor v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
–Taylor v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Overview Agricultural law is often “law by the exception. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 2: Audiovisual works – educational uses – primary and secondary schools (K-12)This proposed class would allow kindergarten through twelfth-grade educators and students to circumvent access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures and other audiovisual works for educational purposes. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Indiana, 14-631 and Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
It asks if the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:21 am
Additional Resources: Alabama’s Jonathan Taylor charged with domestic violence, criminal mischief, March 29, 2015, USA Today More Blog Entries: Marks v. [read post]
