Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Taylor, 47 M.J. 322, 325 (1997); United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:45 am
On March 24, Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss an action filed by the FDIC, as receiver for two failed banks, related to RMBS certificates that the banks purchased. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
Or, at a minimum, explain why it comes out 180 degrees differently than the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:49 pm
United States, No. 07-5716; and Taylor v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Further, if the work to be contracted out is not “exclusive unit work,” the impact of such action of the collective bargaining unit may constitute a mandatory subject to negotiations under the Taylor Law. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:53 pm
In Progress Energy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
Taylor, 2011 WL 1374988 (N.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 3:30 am
National Labor Relations Board to determine if the National Labor Relations Act preempts the Taylor Law in certain situations involving employees of charter schools Buffalo United Charter Sch. v New York State Pub. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for parking on city… [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
[Long Beach Unit], 8 NY3d 465Article V, Section 6 of New York State’s Constitution mandates that appointments and promotions in the civil service of the State and its political subdivisions "shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 11:59 am
” Under the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Taylor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 11:00 am
The Sixth Circuit agreed, relying upon the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
Taylor Borzu Sabahi & Kabir Duggal, Philip Morris Brands Sàrl v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:43 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. [read post]
