Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Spencer" Results 101 - 120 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Spencer 15-316Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of an express agreement to delegate to the arbitrator all issues regarding “arbitrability” when the party opposing arbitration has not specifically challenged the delegation provision itself. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
King County, 15-584, include petitioners familiar to readers of our last Christmas spectacular, Robert Spencer and Pam Geller (no relation to Josie “Grossie” Geller). [read post]
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72  (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Warren Gordon, Olswang LLP
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gov’t shouldn’t instruct people what to buy. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Spencer Roane The losing party then appealed that ruling, and the case was once again before the Supreme Court, this time under the name Martin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jacob: real consumers in the box are perfectly normal people. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
Citing Chief Judge Kaye's concurrence in People v Wesley, the dissent faults the experts' opinions for lacking a proper foundation. [read post]