Search for: "The People v. Hoffman" Results 101 - 120 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
It puts other people uncomfortably in the middle of the friction between you and your ex-wife and they don't want to hear that. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
Such a case was the recent Federal Magistrates Court case of Hoffman and Hoffman, concerning contributions on property settlement, which had me laughing in parts, and gasping at others.The case concerned the old argument that if a husband and wife manage to get wealthy through their marriage due to good luck and management, that must be due to one party, almost invariably the husband, having some special skills.This special skills argument is  usuallyonly raised in cases of… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
A Review of Health Care in the Court July 18, 2022 | Allison Hoffman, University of Pennsylvania Law School Several U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Notable examples of false endorsement claims, such as Hoffman v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 2009 WL 614484, *23 (N.J.Super.A.D. 2009). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Louis attorney Alan Hoffman on the firm’s blog, Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation Industry Insider Challenging FTC Regulation of Cyber-security After FTC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
A few days ago, the New York Times had an insipid editorial deriding the failure of prosecutors to honor their obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence pursuant to Brady v. [read post]