Search for: "The People v. Hoffman"
Results 101 - 120
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
He should be in jail getting but f*cked by the people he abused and put in Jail. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Hoffman and Hussussian explained that many states made it easier for people to enroll in Medicaid by, for example, eliminating enrollment fees. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
The occasion for the study was the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
That argument leans heavily on Hoffman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
See Time, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:36 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
It puts other people uncomfortably in the middle of the friction between you and your ex-wife and they don't want to hear that. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Allwright, Shelley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Tyne v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
See Hoffman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
Such a case was the recent Federal Magistrates Court case of Hoffman and Hoffman, concerning contributions on property settlement, which had me laughing in parts, and gasping at others.The case concerned the old argument that if a husband and wife manage to get wealthy through their marriage due to good luck and management, that must be due to one party, almost invariably the husband, having some special skills.This special skills argument is usuallyonly raised in cases of… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
The rule protects both the police and the people inside the residence. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
