Search for: "United States v. Bacon"
Results 101 - 110
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm
The Plaintiff’s E. coli O157:H7 Infection and Illness Plaintiff consumed a Big Bacon Classic hamburger on August 4, 2022. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
For example, the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, is applicable to certain Federal contracts and subcontracts that utilize service employees to furnish services in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
said jesting Pilate, and would not stay for an answer.Francis Bacon, Essays, "Of Truth. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
I talked earlier in the year with a lawyer who convinced a court that her client’s dog breeding operation was a livestock facility, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Introduction In most states throughout the U.S., consumers visiting a supermarket would not pay state sales taxes on their bacon and eggs for the week, but often would pay sales tax on a ready-made rotisserie chicken. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Notable Cast: Ruth Negga, Joel Edgerton, and Will Dalton.Director: Jeff NicholsYear: 2016IMDB Rating: 7.0/10Memorable Quote: “You realize this case could alter the Constitution of the United States? [read post]
