Search for: "United States v. General Petroleum Corporation" Results 101 - 120 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by WIMS
<> Twelve states produced 80% of U.S. wind power in 2013 - In 2013, 12 states accounted for 80% of U.S. wind-generated electricity, according to preliminary generation data released in EIA's March Electric Power Monthly report -- TX, IA, CA, OK, IL, KS, MN, OR, CO, WA, ND, WY. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm by Don Cruse
WEBRE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF TEXAS UNITED CORPORATION AND UNITED SALT CORPORATION, No. 12-0045 : This petition raises several questions about shareholder suits in closely held corporations. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:38 pm by Marta Requejo
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed Kiobel–The Plot Thickens US Supreme Court Delivers its judgment in Kiobel [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the United States Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit by Nigerian plaintiffs who were suing foreign corporations for allegedly aiding and abetting human rights violations in Nigeria. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:41 am by Trey Childress
Supreme Court To Hear Case Concerning The Scope and Applicability of The Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine Another ATS Case Seeking Supreme Court Review New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:05 am by Bexis
The same general principle also prohibits states from imposing punitive damages on conduct that took place solely in other states. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:20 am by Howard Friedman
 However, Justice Roberts held that this does not generally apply to conduct that took place outside the United States:even where the claims touch and concern the territory of the United States, they must do so with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritorial application.In the case before the Court, plaintiffs alleged that various multi-national corporations aided the Nigerian government in its human rights abuses in… [read post]