Search for: "United States v. Hasting" Results 101 - 120 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:23 pm
  For those of you who don't know, the Marshall Islands have had (and have) a special status with the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:40 am
On March 19, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Ocegueda v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
Amicus brief of United States Senator Thom Tillis, Honorable Paul R. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the letter from this Wednesday states, “[a]fter reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended section 5000A is constitutional” and “it is also now the position of the United States that, if [the] Court nevertheless concludes that Section 5000A is unconstitutional, that provision is severable from the remainder of the ACA. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The Constitution specifies that when the President of the United States is tried, “the Chief Justice shall preside. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Gore: Haste Makes MistakesErwin ChemerinskyChapter 12 Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:30 am by Carl Coleman
Carl Coleman Gun violence in the United States has become a public health crisis, with an average of 100 Americans killed by firearms every day. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm by Edward Foley
Gore, in its haste, failed to address the precedent of Taylor v. [read post]