Search for: "United States v. 6 DEVICES, ETC."
Results 101 - 117
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
What steps does the company undertake in the realm of security science to stay current about the latest cybersecurity intrusion modus operandi, cybersecurity-related software patches,[6] data breach trends, etc.? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
Patent System The US patent laws are set out in Title 35 of the United States Code (35 U.S.C.). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
It is apparent from the Statement of Objects and Reasons for introducing section 438 in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that it was felt imperative to evolve a device by which an alleged accused is not compelled to face ignominy and disgrace at the instance of influential people who try to implicate their rivals in false cases. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
However, since the New Streamlined Procedures are now available to U.S. taxpayers residing in the United States, the 2014 OVDP is intended to be used by taxpayers who have serious concerns with criminal violations. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
This is what is keeping the Federal Communications Commission,[6] the Federal Trade Commission,[7] some in Congress,[8] and many media worrywarts up at night: the fear that, as traditional financing mechanisms falter (advertising, classifieds, subscription revenues, etc.), many traditional news-gathering efforts and institutions will disappear. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
It also highlights and partially explores the difference in the United States and Australian copyright laws with a few case studies of legal issues surrounding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks in Australia. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
His device was called a hydrosphygmograph. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
But not every manufacturer took that as an opportunity to keep from compensating the composers that made their devices so valuable to the public. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
”[6] Therefore, applying this law to our hypothetical facts, we need to determine: Whether the entity in each transaction is a “person” as defined for purposes of the tax; Whether the “person” has “gross revenues from digital advertising services”; Whether those digital advertising services were “in the state”; and, if so, How they are to be apportioned. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=qlRtLGorhdY Pricing: Per month per user fees. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
