Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2017, 8:23 pm
United States 16-814 Issue: Whether the existence of a forced choice between what religion and government command is necessary to establish a “substantial burden” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
One could simply chalk this up to a lack of incumbency, but that ignores something very interesting about elections in the United States: If incumbents matter as much as they do, then so does a person’s choice to vote for the incumbent. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
The abstract appears below:The election of an African American as President of the United States has raised questions regarding the continued relevance and even constitutionality of various provisions of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
It feels like the United States is being stalked by the grotesque and deadly Greek god, Typhon, whose lawless rampages ceased only when Zeus moved Mount Etna to bury him forever. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
As was recently reported on this blog, this past May the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Second, the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of over 100 members of a proposed class of consumers throughout the United States, including class members from states other than Delaware or California. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:35 am
With little choice, she filed an appeal in the United States District Court, and that court affirmed the ALJ’s denial of benefits. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
If this were a diversity case, Klaxon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
United States is the 1977 case that established the "narrowest grounds" rule. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Imburgia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:25 pm
Earlier this year, the January 6 committee requested certain documents from the Archivist of the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:46 am
In Burress v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
Colvin, August 19, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mays v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
Yates v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
Many pro-life advocates would support them too, although some parts of the pro-life coalition would not be happy about government funding of contraception and day care and might still oppose them vigorously.The key point, however, is that a Freedom of Choice Act would significantly change the political playing field concerning family policy in the United States. [read post]
