Search for: "United States v. Felt" Results 101 - 120 of 2,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:09 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court decided one criminal case today, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Sandy
The decision denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:49 am by Kaufman Dolowich
 Under the CTA, most entities will be required to disclose detailed information about their beneficial owners to the United States Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
In KSR, the Supreme Court stated that even if a claimed invention passes the TSM test, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may still reject a patent claim using things such as "common sense. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:14 pm by Daniel Harawa
United States felt like a legislation class in law school, with various canons of statutory construction being bandied about. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:28 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
Yudes’ June, 2013 blog post, he discussed the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  Erazo testified that the birth of M.S.O. only increased the urgency she felt to come to the United States and that she and Ortiz had jointly agreed on a plan where they could all resettle there. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]