Search for: "United States v. Gaines"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:43 pm
Curvin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
United States, 76 Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:16 am
Here are the notices of withdrawal of laches as a defense in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 10:39 pm
United States continues the long-standing controversy over the Constitution's distinction between "direct" and "indirect" taxes. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 1:17 pm
Every ten years the United States conducts a census and then based on that states redraw their district electoral maps to account for gains or losses in populations. [read post]
Alasaad v. McAleenan: Suspicionless Smartphone Searches at the Border are Unconstitutional, For Now.
8 Mar 2020, 5:08 pm
This is shown in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
Having no other option, claimant filed for an appeal in the United States District Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
Yates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 8:53 pm
Colvin, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, features an opinion written by Judge Posner. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:00 am
United States, Nos. 3:06cv379 to... [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:34 am
United States [transcript, PDF]. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:02 am
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that family farmers filing bankruptcy under Chapter 12 of the bankruptcy code [text] cannot discharge a capital gains tax incurred by a post-petition sale of a farm, as the profit of that sale is not considered part of the estate. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 7:42 am
Franklin v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
This provides a crucial protection because, as the Court notes, although such a defendant "ultimately may gain nothing from his limited success on appeal, . . . he will also lose nothing, as he will serve no more time than the trial court originally ordered. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
