Search for: "United States v. Harris, et al."
Results 101 - 120
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
FEC and Vermont Right to Life Committee, et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
Wofford, et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
Cir. 2017);SmithKline, 439 F.3d at 1320; Harris Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
Adoption Law in Turkey and the United States. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:27 pm
In Jones et al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Subsequently, on or about September 6, 2012, defendant filed a discrimination lawsuit on plaintiff’s behalf in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen v Chanel, Inc., et al., 12-cv-6758 (LAP). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
HARRY M. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:43 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991), but advised that its grant of authority for that particular deposition should not be considered precedent, and China has not permitted a deposition since. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 6:28 pm
They also noted that the National Alliance is a lawful corporation in good standing and had no criminal convictions either in Canada or the United States. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm
Full text available online at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/15/1/08-0299_article.htm Harris, JP, et al. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Harry F. [read post]
