Search for: "United States v. Interstate General Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2017, 8:00 am
Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd, (1920) 28 C.L.R. 129, 153). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Holmes Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
United States, 11 U.S. 382, 386 (1813); Marshall Field & Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to CAFA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Speed v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
In 1935 in Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 349 (1944) (rejecting the application of sales tax to an out-of-state sale); General Trading Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 10:12 am
., v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
United States, 585 U. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The core theory of the Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC) is that some state regulations of interstate commerce--especially protectionist ones--infringe on a presumptive congressional policy of treating the United States as a free-trade zone. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Michael Mongan, the California Solicitor General, represented the state, while Jeffrey Lamken represented the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
