Search for: "United States v. Sosa"
Results 101 - 120
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Under Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
This was made clear in his decision in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
In its seminal 2004 opinion in Sosa, the Supreme Court had specifically left open the question of whether the ATS applies to non-state actors, such as corporations. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Supreme Court (above left) set out in Sosa v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Our third criticism is that the majority’s analysis of whether corporations are ‘subjects’ of international law is in error, for the simple reason that such analysis is irrelevant to the question of whether the United States, through the enactment of a statute, could impose domestic civil liability on corporations for conduct that violates international law. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
This is evident in, for example, his discussion of the Court’s prior decision on the ATS, Sosa v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 2:19 pm
Dhooge, Lohengrin Revealed: The Implications of Sosa v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:04 am
Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
A finding that the ATS does not "apply" to extraterritorial conduct also seems inconsistent with the Court's own pronouncement in Sosa v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:23 pm
See Sosa v. [read post]
