Search for: "United States v. Valdez" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
While concerns and actions in Europe and the United States often get the international headlines, local groups in Latin America are doing the vital groundwork of investigating transgressions, lobbying for change, and litigating for justice. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am by Katitza Rodriguez
While concerns and actions in Europe and the United States often get the international headlines, local groups in Latin America are doing the vital groundwork of investigating transgressions, lobbying for change, and litigating for justice. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Two very low points for victims rights came from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:10 am
These latter numbers mean that the spill has already dwarfed the infamous 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill, and, that, as of today, the Exxon Valdez spill, which involved 11 million gallons, is no longer the United State's worst oil spill. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) Laffey Associates - You can’t fire me, I own the copyright: Valdez v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am by Pace Law School Library
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. 6 Tex. [read post]