Search for: "United States v. William Kennedy"
Results 101 - 120
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 3:50 am
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights; bankruptcy case Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
The Court’s decision in the case leaves open the question of whether the United States can subject the thousands of individuals awaiting a final judicial decision on their applications for immigration relief to prolonged civil detention. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
The most recent affirmative action case before the Supreme Court of the United States is Fisher v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
" The blog of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts tells the story of Mendez v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:33 am
United States suggested that Quirin is very much alive. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
Ainsa, Jr. of El Paso, Texas, arguing for petitioner, began by appealing to the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Connecticut, Justice William O. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John Roberts peppered the plaintiffs’ attorney with questions focused on, as Justice Alito asked, “What business does [this] case have in the courts of the United States?” [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John Roberts peppered the plaintiffs’ attorney with questions focused on, as Justice Alito asked, “What business does [this] case have in the courts of the United States? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
