Search for: "Foote v. United States" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
 The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
 However, the losing party to a suit that is properly brought in federal district court shall have the right to appeal to a state intermediate appellate court, and thence to the state’s highest court, to the extent that, and on equal footing with, appeals that would be available from a state trial court sitting where the federal district court sits. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Seth W. Stoughton
The scenario above roughly describes the constitutional regulation of police use of force in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am by INFORRM
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  What started out as a joke by the writers of The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits has taken on terrifying proportions as the dangerous war of words between North Korea’s despot and the President of the United States plays out through, of all things, Trump’s twitter account. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:52 am by Jonathan Bailey
With that ruling in place, there wasn’t much legal dispute to be had in the United States and it wasn’t until Aereo seven years later that the test was called into question. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Except that they, unlike other prisoners in the United States, have never been convicted of a crime. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
 Left Foot Forward also pointed out that in the original online story in the Daily Mail about the article 50 ruling, they referred to the judge’s sexuality, before removing it. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the one hand, there is the standard from United States v. [read post]