Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
Dörner: Better too late than never – The classification of § 1371 Sect. 1 German Civil Code as relating to matrimonial property in German and European Private International Law After more than 40 years of discussion the German Federal Supreme Court finally (and rightly so) has classified § 1371 Sect. 1 of the German Civil Code as relating to matrimonial property. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:46 am
Clouser v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The case is Gabriele v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
As per publication in the patent journal, the patent legally takes effect.Art. 139 of the [German] Patent Act states in its current form:(1) Against him who practices a patented invention in violation of articles 9 through 13, the holder of the infringed patent is entitled to an injunction if there is a risk of a recurring violation. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:43 pm
Neb., 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Bartels v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:22 am
Prior to the full CJEU decision, Advocate General Szpunar gave his consideration on the matter in late 2018.The case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben concerned the band Kraftwerk (a well-known German electronic music band), consisting of the claimants Mr Hütter and Schneider-Esleben. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
” At the National Council of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Nelson v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
| Google cannot hide behind its algorithms, German court finds | Does the InfoSoc Directive envisage digital exhaustion? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
M/V Arica, Civil Action No. 20-679-RGA, 2022 U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
Who bears the evidential burden and the standard required for the burden to be discharged are germane questions. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Hulu) http://t.co/FcBypcfwL1 -> US 1st Circuit affirms statutory damage award in Sony BMG v Tenenbaum http://t.co/ssyPB54Q82 -> Search of computer reasonable R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
On June 24th 1996, the European Commission of Human Rights ruled the case Ramirez Sanchez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
In a decision of 26 February 2015 (published in May), the German Bundesgerichtshof addresses the extent to which innovations in user interface design are patentable. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
