Search for: "In Re AC"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
In the light of this language, it would not have been surprising if the Bill had offered a radical re-shifting of the law in favour of freedom of expression. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Newton (Excess Copyright) (IPblog) Putting statutory damages in perspective (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Macleans on C-32 & Fair Dealing: Claims of rampant copying ‘grossly exaggerated’ (Michael Geist) Opening remarks to the Legislative Committee on Bill C-32 (IP Osgoode) NDP MP Angus calls for compromise on Bill C-32 (Michael Geist) C-32’s Fair Dealing (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Sorting through the Copyright Levy proposals (Michael Geist) Cineplex introduces… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
Lord Phillips considered the various formulations of the test of “public interest” in Reynolds [2001] 2 AC 127 and Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, agreeing with Lady Hale’s formulation in the latter case that “There must be some real public interest in having this information in the public domain. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
"It's informal and it's rapid, so you assume you're getting the same paralinguistic cues you get from spoken communication. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
See In re U.S., 665 F. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Reference was also made to the retirement-age swimming pool case, James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
"So you're saying you've done something criminal?! [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Em discussão: Saber se o acórdão embargado incide nas alegadas omissão, contradição e obscuridade. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 1:34 pm
Pix credit here The epitaphioi logoi (ἐπιτάφιος λόγος), ancient Greek public funeral orations, was an important part of the public and communal rituals of burying those who were no longer among the living. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 9:45 am
For example, let’s say you’re a litigation paralegal who wants to set a goal next year to get your ACEDS certification. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
He might have given the impression, he said, that ‘the ace of trumps always wins the trick’. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
I would ask MEPs to reject the entire bill because it's the clearest message (then the Commission will have to go back to the drawing board and a new EP, with many EU skeptics, will give them an even harder time) or, if they're hesitant to do what actually made sense in 2005 for the software patents bill, they should delete Article 13. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Floyd, The One-Year Limit On Removal: An Ace Up The Sleeve Of The Unscrupulous Litigant? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
Did the AC break down? [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
[Re St. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
There we’re moving to allowing that, but what about uses by other firms? [read post]
