Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1181 - 1200
of 13,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2021, 3:41 am
In re 1872 LLC, Serial No. 88897035 (September 23, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
In re U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
In re Gould Paper, 5 USPQ2d at 1112. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
In re Chas. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
” In re Gregory, 70 USPQ2d 1792, 1796 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:51 am
" In re Beds & Bars, Ltd., 122 USPQ2d 1546, 1551 (TTAB 2017); see also In re Eximius Coffee, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1281 (TTAB 2016) (“Section 2(e)(4) makes no distinction between rare and commonplace surnames . . . and even a rare surname is unregistrable if its primary significance to purchasers is a surname. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:44 am
" [See, e.g., the ATTIC sprinkler case, In re Central Sprinkler Co., 49 USPQ2d 1194, 1199 (TTAB 1998). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:33 am
Most privacy lawsuits don’t make it past the pleading stage, but defendants who lost motions to dismiss typically just wrote settlement checks (e.g., Google with Buzz and Facebook with Beacon and Sponsored Stories). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:05 pm
The landlord may “peaceably” re-enter the premises; or 2. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Frequent delays, road closures and construction (e.g., the LBJ Express Project) are often the cause—and sometime result—of serious car accidents. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:37 am
See In re Finley, 408 B.R. 111, 114 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
As we move further down the line to the “Internet of Things” (e.g. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am
They’re let on long leases with covenants to pay service charges. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:34 pm
They're called contracts. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
Clever lawyers (e.g. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 3:34 am
In re Time USA, LLC, Serial No. 90493176 (June 17, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
2 May 2013, 6:09 am
Employees whose peak work coincides with the lunch hour (e.g., bank tellers). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
[1] See, e.g., Valentine v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:54 am
If you have a legitimate reason to review an employee’s social media accounts (e.g., is the employee trashing your business online, or is the employee divulging confidential information?) [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
[1] See, e.g., Valentine v. [read post]
