Search for: "In re Schwartz" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2008, 9:09 pm
Re-using someone else's art was one of his fair use interests, as he saw me do with Arlo's cover that I pirated, and he regaled me with the story of the guy who took Garfield out of the Garfield comics to reveal the angst of his hapless owner, Jon. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
In fact, a more complete study over a longer time period by Price Waterhouse Coopers found that the Eastern District of Texas affirmance rate is only slightly below the national average for all districts.[9] The Federal Circuit recently confirmed in In re TC Heartland (Fed. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Also, this rule will likely be of little value: if you’re going to go through the trouble of having “conspicuous” notice, why would you not just have a check the box? [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
At a candidate forum in October, Letlow urged the state to ease pandemic restrictions, saying, “We’re now at a place if we do not open our economy, we’re in real danger. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
CFPB, Justice Kagan accused the majority of deploying an “anti-power-concentration principle” to declare the agency’s single-director structure unconstitutional.[2] She then quipped, without citation, that “[i]f you’ve never heard of a statute being struck down on that ground, you’re not alone. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm by Michael Froomkin
Schwartz Judicial Excellence Award, its “Put Something Back” pro bono service award and its special public service award. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've debunked what we consider a spurious argument HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) interferes with state law on this subject, since that statute specifically excludes civil litigation from its purview.But we know, because we're involved in litigation all over the country, that not every (probably not even most) state agrees with us. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
James Schwartz II also did consulting work for the campaign through companies he controlled. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Schwartz’s embezzlement took place over at least eight years, prosecutors said. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am by Bob Ambrogi
— Dan Schwartz (@danielschwartz) November 10, 2019 If deals with consumers AT ALL, #1 would be "learn how the m [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Emma Snell
Henry Foy and Felicia Schwartz report for the Financial Times. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]