Search for: "NIXON v. STATE"
Results 1181 - 1199
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
SO, HERE’S THE BOTTOM-LINE… In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
But obstruction of Congress is now all but certain to be introduced as well, just as it was five decades ago when the House Judiciary Committee voted for articles of impeachment against then-President Richard Nixon. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
A number of states that have passed anti price-gouging legislation have recognized the disadvantage of the ambiguous standard and have opted for more specific standards in the form of percentage-caps or no-increase laws. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
(nominado por Richard Nixon). [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Nixon was the great advocate for legal services. 10:47 Changes in legal services could help. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:23 am
In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
Due to inflationary pressures, in August 1971, the Nixon administration imposed a pay and price “freeze” for a 90-day period. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Mojo Nixon - "Destroy All Lawyers" (There's a plague on the planet, and they went to law school. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
August 24, 2006Re: Professor X And The Conservative Judges Of Reagan And The Two Bushes.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
Mattel v. [read post]
