Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 7,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
Jacobs profiles Peter Keisler, “a go-to guy for industry on Clean Air Act cases at the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 3:01 am
” [Peter Van Doren and Randal O’Toole, Cato] Whether grounded in official discretion or legislation, cash exactions levied on land development should still need to meet constitutional standards [Ilya Shapiro and Reilly Stephens on Cato Institute certiorari amicus brief in Dabbs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am
Peter Thiel match-up [Jacob Gershman, WSJ] “Prosecutors Investigate Firms That Offer Plaintiffs Early Cash” [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Seventh Circuit: parents, not Starbucks, bore duty of protecting 3-year-old from harm resulting from playing on crowd-control stanchions [Roh v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:39 pm
Myers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:01 pm
GARRETT, PETER G. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
Peter M. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:44 am
Our colleague Peter A. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:40 am
In a case like Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:53 am
Ross, Short Circuit on Turner v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
Bluman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:21 am
In the recent federal court case of ActivEngage, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:11 am
Our colleague Peter L. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
” Kimley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Ann Althouse] Citing First Amendment, federal court enjoins FDA from prohibiting truthful speech by drugmakers about off-label uses [WSJ, Alex Tabarrok (in recent years, federal government “has extracted billions of dollars in settlements from pharmaceutical firms for engaging in what appears to be constitutionally protected speech”), Beck and Sullivan, Drug & Device Law on Amarin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:56 am
Louis V. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Her analysis of Bhasin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
In the recent case of Phillips Roberts (Liquidator of Onslow Ditching Ltd) v (1) Peter Frohlich (2) Godfrey Spanner [2011] EWHC 257 (Ch), the High Court was asked to decide whether the respondent directors had breached their fiduciary duties by continuing with a land development project when it was not in the best interests of the company or its creditors. [read post]
