Search for: "United States v. Daniels" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2021, 6:08 am by DONALD SCARINCI
EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C.: Although the case involves Kentucky’s controversial abortion law, the issue before the Court is whether the state’s Attorney General Daniel Cameron can intervene to defend it. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
United States (No. 96-8986), in which the Court appointed now-Judge Jeff Sutton.) [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  On the individual rights side, the Guarantee Clause implicitly grants United States citizens who are residents of states the right to vote for state legislative offices. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
  At Concurring Opinions, Daniel Solove has a detailed two-part analysis of the issues at stake in NASA. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]
31 May 2014, 12:41 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
To read more on this case, please read Frank Battaglia v Healthbridge Management LLC, which was decided on May 29, 2014 by the United States District Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:32 pm by rainey Reitman
 United States (finding the government could not enjoin the New York Times from publishing Vietnam war documents from whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg) and Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Daniel, The Regulatory Review In Kokesh v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
Daniel Fisher of Forbes previews the arguments in Lozman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Most recently, in 2004, the Supreme Court echoed this point by concluding, in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]