Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 1201 - 1220 of 3,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Greg Mersol
  The court was troubled with some of the allegations made in the complaint but found that, it did allege at various points that the private equity firm: (a) owned Fortis; (b) maintained “a continuous presence” at the plant and “ordered” its closing; (c) “controlled” labor relations at the plant; (d) was paid a $500,000 annual fee to manage Fortis; (e) had employees that supervised the management of the plant. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Andrew Weber
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z A Afghanistan Algeria American Samoa Argentina Australia Austria B Bangladesh… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
Therefore, the Cancellation Division rightly concluded that the sign lacked any distinctive character under Art. 7(1)(b)....But not if it's acquired distinctiveness through use...War time Kit Kat Article 52(2) provides that where the mark has been registered in breach of the grounds laid down in Art. 7(1)(b), (c) or (d) it may nevertheless not be declared invalid if it has acquired distinctive character through use in the relevant part of the EU where it was… [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:33 am
Dès le début, Google a cherché à intégrer la protection de la vie privée dans ses services et ce, dès le stade de leur conception. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:05 am by Larry
To be successful the petitioner must show:(A) that the petitioner expects to be a party to an action cognizable in this court but cannot presently bring it or cause it to be brought; (B) the subject matter of the expected action and the petitioner’s interest; (C) the facts that the petitioner wants to establish by the proposed testimony and the reasons to perpetuate it; (D) the names or a description of the persons whom the petitioner expects to be adverse… [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
En bref, dans ces deux affaires, des actionnaires de sociétés commerciales effectuèrent diverses transactions pour procéder à la restructuration de ces sociétés et la cession d’intérêts dans celles-ci. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
” She further alleged that “[t]he parties have not specifically agreed otherwise in a validly executed agreement or stipulation and three years have passed since the order was entered, last modified or adjusted. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am by Andrew Wooley
In addressing the first element of the Gore framework, the court examined each of the five reprehensibility factors identified in State Farm: (a) whether the harm was physical rather than economic, (b) whether the conduct showed an indifference to or reckless disregard for the health or safety of others, (c) whether the target of the conduct was financially vulnerable, (d) whether the conduct was repeated rather than an isolated incident, and (e) whether the harm… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am by Liskow & Lewis
In addressing the first element of the Gore framework, the court examined each of the five reprehensibility factors identified in State Farm: (a) whether the harm was physical rather than economic, (b) whether the conduct showed an indifference to or reckless disregard for the health or safety of others, (c) whether the target of the conduct was financially vulnerable, (d) whether the conduct was repeated rather than an isolated incident, and (e) whether the harm… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
We're predictably pleased with yesterday's Eleventh Circuit opinion in Wolicki-Gables v. [read post]