Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 1201 - 1220 of 11,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2008, 9:57 pm
Feb. 27, 2004) (noting that "[t]he courts of appeals are split over whether Varity ever permits a plaintiff who has been denied benefits to simultaneously bring an action for benefits under § 1132(a)(1)(B) and an action for breach of fiduciary duty under § 1132(a)(3)(B)" and collecting cases). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 2:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Act provides the following time periods for submitting patent information to FDA, depending on when the patent is granted: With the 505(b)(1) application Within 30 days of approval of the 505(b)(1) application Within 30 days of grant of the patent The Act does not specify any stand-alone consequences for “late” listing or failing to list a patent. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
It does so by focussing primarily on colonial lawyers. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:16 pm by Old Fox
"Chapter 9: How to Statisticulate"Does it make sense? [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:07 pm
(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001) at 3-27. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:10 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
It might also fall under the remainder of Art. 13(1), which protects GIs from misuse, evocation, or other misleading practices.The Proposal for a new GI Regulation suggests expanding the existing scope of protection to cases where “a domain name contain[s] or consist[s] of the registered geographical indication” (Art. 27(3). [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:18 pm
According to the indictment, Vitale sent out over 1 million emails over the course of one week in August 2005. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Joel Barnett
For more information, please call our office in Miami — our number is 1-800-905-2891. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
 One of ordinary skill does not know the bounds of the claim. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:17 am by Eleonora Rosati
After an appeal to the Higher Regional Courts of Munich and Hamburg, the cases reached the BGH.At the core of all this is the question of when the platforms YouTube and Uploaded themselves perform an act of communication or making available to the public under the German equivalent of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.The CJEU held that a platform operator does perform an own communication to the public when it does not limit itself to providing physical facilities… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City & County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 670.) [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
June 27, 2014).Issues[1] Hill-Rom argues that the district court erred by limiting “datalink” to [...] a wired datalink. [read post]