Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
"Games might be and [are] the serious business of life to many people. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Why put up with the solitary vice of the podcast, or the earnest efforts on the webinar, when you can join the IPKat's Campaign for Real People, show off your smartphone tp people who haven't seen it yet and even get rid of a few business cards at the same time! [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm
The case of Nzolameso v Westminster has made it too difficult. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:09 pm
City of New London. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
That's very gratifying when we consider that every one of these people is or was sufficiently interested in IP to want to receive news of all its posts. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
The seminar, ""Future Plans: next steps for trade marks in Europe", was launched only mid-day yesterday, but now has more than 60 people registered to attend on the afternoon of Tuesday 5 April at the London office of law firm Simmons & Simmons. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm
Everyone reading this blog will have seen how difficult the benefit cap makes it for many people to live in major cities, especially London (and, in turn, how difficult it makes it for local authorities to discharge their homelessness duties by finding t.a. in London – watch out for more out-of-area placement disputes). [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
†The Supreme Court rebuffed one such effort in its 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 7:22 pm
By July 27, 2021, almost 200 million people across the world were known to have been infected and more than four million had died. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
Morrisons supermarket chain has been fined for breaking the law on how people’s personal information should be treated when sending marketing emails. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
Currently the company does not allow people who are under this age to create an account on the platform. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Most notably, O'Connor wrote the Court's majority opinion in New York v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
In 1981, in Haig v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
’ He also said that ‘When people and companies use legal means to minimize their tax bills, that’s not corrupt or greedy or unfair, it’s playing by the rules. [read post]
