Search for: "State v. Prince"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Seng v. the TMO On 20 February 2019, the TMO rejected the trade mark application (Decision [2019] No. 34784, ‘the TMO’s decision’) for violating Article 10.1(8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
And it’s named after an inspiring figure: Raymond V. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:22 am
’ McCroskey, Feldman, Cochrane & Brock, P.C. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
No word, though, on state-approved pitchforks in public buildings. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:04 am
Justice Kennedy, to the extent anyone wrote for the Court, glossed over the big issue of Marsh v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
In Community for Creative Non-Violence v. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:30 am
It seems unlikely that the CJ, when deciding matters such as United States v. [read post]
