Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
Thus, California's recent brief in Video Game Dealers Association v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
California (1973), though with extra detail added by Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Both in damages determinations and in standing doctrine, US courts are all too willing to deny or marginalize a claim based on a data breach or invasion of privacy because of the plaintiff’s inability to demonstrate the concrete and particular harm arising out of a particular offense. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
The Washington Post writes that “the Afghan military has always invested a large portion of its combat power into checkpoints and fixed positions, a strategy that has severely limited its ability to mount offensive operations. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm
(Which type of law, incidentally, California already had before Chelsea’s Law was recently passed.) [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a warrantless search of a California parolee, limiting the reach of that case to situations in which the supervisee chooses supervision in the community (and its attendant conditions) over imprisonment. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 3:22 am
(§ 32 V-W.) [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Contrast that with (Winter v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
After his initial take-down requests went unanswered by Google, he eventually served a section 10 DPA notice on Google asking for it to prevent the offensive material appearing in Google’s search results in the UK. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
This process could take months or years. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
First, many states outlaw all sex — without exceptions for people close in age — not just with under-13-year-olds, but with under-16-year-olds or, in the case of California, under-18-year-olds. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Department of Labor Fictional Scenario – Tinker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
One inevitably pictures a disinterested spotty nineteen year old in California conducting what the courts have described as an “intense focus” between competing rights. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:08 pm
The FEC, citing NAACP v. [read post]
