Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 51,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
This is an otherwise routine death penalty case in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am
Case Citation: Cub Club Investment, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
Well perhaps Behzadi v Behzadi would have made it in because of the amount of ground it covered, the 'Barder-event' case Dixon v Marchant was important, as was the Brussells II case Bush v Bush. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
Perhaps the most well known (albeit convoluted) perception of a frivolous lawsuit is that of Stella Liebeck v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
Because we want a neutral magistrate to decide -- except in the most extreme cases -- whether circumstances truly warrant (pun intended) making people no longer "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
In each of these cases, I'm not sure what it was that persuaded the robbers to ditch that house and go to a different one. [read post]
29 Nov 2004, 3:15 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:01 am
Superintendent (1962) and Mattz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:05 pm
In Court 15 of the Rolls Building the current managing judge Mr Justice Mann will begin hearing the trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
The Supreme Court’s case number for this matter is S279242, and the Court’s docket states that the case presents the following issues: “(1) Does the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Recent Cases: Simmons v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:32 am
In the Cincinnati case, Elektra v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
This case is a perfect example. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
The two cases are Pulsifer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
It would have been standard in a criminal case. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
In People v Morbillo(2008 NY Slip Op 09102, 56 AD3d 694 [2d Dept 11/18/08]) the Second Department considered the consequence of the failure of a superior court, during the plea proceedings, to advise the defendant that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction. [read post]
