Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 1221 - 1240 of 6,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law § 297[9] and the… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:51 am by Sean G. Hanagan
While this case may come too late for some who have had to seek other work or leave the United States, other petitioners and beneficiaries whose cases were denied may find this useful. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm by Keith Rizzardi
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 5140729 (M.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
(“RLR”) petitioned the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to vacate an arbitration award issued in favor of William Webb (“Webb”) on the grounds that the arbitrator acted in manifest disregard of the law. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The Supreme Court upheld the free speech rights of state and local public-sector workers in Janus v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by Ettinger Law Firm
The United States Supreme Court referred to it as “a widely recognized” cause of action and as the “tort of interference with a gift or inheritance” in the Anna Nicole Smith case. [read post]