Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 2:46 pm
The California Supreme Court today decided People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:23 am
The case is Hutcher v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
Weeks v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
Earlier in his dissent he cites a passage from Tumey v Ohio, in which the Court states: All questions of judicial qualifications may not involve constitutional validity. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Kitazato v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
This was expressed in the case of People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
Moreover, at least in a high-performance Zivco Edge 540, she may well be a better pilot than the people who watched her take off from the Butler County Airport in 2006. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
Faucheux, May 28, 2015, Mississippi Supreme Court More Blog Entries:Bogner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
The RIAA lawyers are seeking an adjournment of the appellate argument scheduled to be conducted on May 19th at 2:00 PM in Manhattan in Lava Records v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Indeed, they are more so: while many people in the country may share the same name, no two phone subscribers share the same number. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
#ThanksPETA Case Citations: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Background In 1983, a jury convicted Frank Spisak of murdering three people. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:19 am
Morrisette v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 pm
It's easier to hire people, by contrast, who may have the ability to make $X but who nonetheless may be persuaded to prefer a more fulfilling life in the Attorney General's Office, as those hypothetical earnings are much easier to set aside than current earnings.So if you're willing to train from the inside, rather than making other employers do it for you, at the outset, at least some of this problem might be avoided. [read post]
