Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 1221 - 1240 of 23,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The judge stated that the court must determine whether there is a real and substantial tort by reference to the tort complained of in the Particulars of Claim. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
NYU (3 v. 7) and Georgetown (11 v. 14) are harmed the most.Now, the degree to which this benefits or harms a school entirely depends, of course, on how much USNWR chooses to reduce the weight of the category.For schools presently outside the “top 50,” schools that stand to gain the most include Wayne State, Baylor, Penn State-Dickinson, Tennessee, and Penn State-University Park. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
NYU (3 v. 7) and Georgetown (11 v. 14) are harmed the most.Now, the degree to which this benefits or harms a school entirely depends, of course, on how much USNWR chooses to reduce the weight of the category.For schools presently outside the “top 50,” schools that stand to gain the most include Wayne State, Baylor, Penn State-Dickinson, Tennessee, and Penn State-University Park. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
The respondent operated a policy of enhanced security for certain records, including those of transgender customers, where disclosure may result in substantial distress or harm (‘the SCR policy’). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
If no such solution is found, California residents and people worldwide will suffer great harm. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Subsequently, in Centre Ice Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 1:40 pm
In other places, the Court states that the relevant focus is on the disparity between the punitive damages award and the "harm, or potential harm, to the plaintiff. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by Karen Gullo
“The fact that many other people would be harmed in a similar way doesn’t change that or negate the fact that the state’s choice of voting system can disenfranchise the voters in this case. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
The case is made difficult by respondents’ strong arguments that they will suffer irreparable harm because, despite a congressional finding to the contrary, marijuana does have valid therapeutic purposes. [read post]