Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 49,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2006, 6:14 am
If you’re going to read one law opinion today from the Third District Appellate Court of California’s Court of Appeals, read People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
Reed case involving disclosure of the names of people signing a referendum concerning Washington State’s gay rights law. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:50 am
Supreme Court ruled inMiller v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Wilson: We want people to familiarize themselves with the laws bearing on their activities. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
The anniversaries of Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF THE LAW GOVERNING LAWYERS §82; 24 FED. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:28 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
[New York Criminal Procedure Law] §§ 100.40, 100.15; People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
On 7 December 2011, the judge gave his full reasons for making this unusual order (Law Society (and others) v Rick Kordowski [2011] EWHC 3185 (QB)). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:22 pm
appeared first on Ed Folsom Law. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
Where people skim their feeds, draw fast inferences and move on, the law can and should approach the meaning of the words complained of from that “impressionistic” perspective. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
State Department, is Sterling Professor of International Law and Co-Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at Yale Law School, which submitted an amicus brief on behalf of 52 former national security officials in support of respondents in Trump v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
Even though what the judge told the jurors was totally correct as a matter of law, the process employed here seems troubling to me.Something that I'm sure will hear more about -- in another decade or so -- when the federal habeas proceedings reach the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
Which is a place far different than UCSB, and where you definitely don't want to spend the rest of your life if you've lived in the United States for virtually forever.And when your efforts reach the California Supreme Court, with sympathetic judges vacating prior sentences so you avoid mandatory deportation, you'll find that the law doesn't look favorably upon habeas remedies that transpire only -- as here -- only after you have already fully served your sentence. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:10 am
Which just goes to show that just because a law is written that says X, everyone may still do Y -- thousands of times a day, for years -- until someone actually bothers to read and interpret the actual statute.Mind you, I'm not sure that typical police practices will change anytime soon. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:41 am
So that's what I'll do.A big law day -- on both a macro and micro level -- for our hero. [read post]
