Search for: "United States v. Toole"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2007, 10:20 pm
In Warshak v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:59 pm
” Inner-Tite Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am
Applications for hashtag trademarks continue to soar, with over 1,042 hashtag trademark applications in 2015 in the United States alone. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Virginia was decided], just 3 percent of marriages in the United States were interracial. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued an opinion letter in 2006 stating that “any employer policy that requires deductions from the salaries of its exempt employees to pay for the costs of lost or damaged tools or equipment” constitutes an “improper deduction,” thereby invalidating the exempt status of any affected employee. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:31 am
United States case, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
–stage amicus brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:03 am
’ United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
Spokeo, Inc., and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:00 pm
For an early example of this, see United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:45 am
Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks, considers Dr. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]
