Search for: "Britain v. Britain" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am by Maria Kendrick
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Social media has been used this way before during other ‘crisis events,’ For example, in the aftermath of the 2011 riots, in R v Blackshaw [2011] EWCA Crim 2312 evidence was presented that suggested that social media was used to coordinate the public disorder that spread across the UK. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am by Valerio De Stefano
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by INFORRM
After all, to do so would inevitably bring to far wider public attention a critique which has thus far circulated only online and break the traditional Fleet Street omertà on anything which has the temerity to question the integrity of Britain’s national newspapers. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
See the DSM-IV-TR (or the newer DSM-V) and traits from other sources to see what they are, and see how you and your friends rate. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
From the day the treaty securing independence from Britain was ratified, right up to the present, it’s been a collection of states and territories. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm by Andrew Hudson
A series of cases sought to clarify the defence in s123, for the benefit of brand owners, the most definitive of which was Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Sun called the fine “pathetic” and asked whether Britain is now “deep in a quicksand of political correctness and hand-wringing over human rights“. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am by Marco D'Ostuni
In particular, to maintain a fair proportion with 5G spectrum auction prices, license renewal fees should reflect the specific features of the WiMax license renewals, in terms of: (i) actual band quantity; (ii) smaller geographic coverage; (iii) shorter duration; (iv) differences in market potential; and (v) absence of further renewal rights. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am by SHG
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am by Dr Richard Cornes
” The line, “we are a court, and not a law reform body”, it will be recalled was one strand of Lady Hale’s dissent in the Radmacher v Granatino decision. [read post]