Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 12,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:26 pm
For many years PTI imported Singha Beer into the United States under an agreement with BRTI. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
In a recent interview with California Lawyer magazine, United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made what has become a somewhat controversial statement about gender discrimination and the United States Constitution:You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:44 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
The California Supreme Court, you see, doesn’t read the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 11:55 am
On April 21, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, issued a watershed decision in Briskin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
Shubb of the Eastern District of California issued an opinion denying certification in Quezada v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Three states, California, Connecticut and New York, have put such statutes into law. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 3:33 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently held that an insurer breached its duty to defend where the undisputed facts demonstrated that there was a "potential" for coverage under the policy. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
Solicitor General Robert Bork in the Second Circuit to overturn racketeering and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
HamiltonCase number: 12-cv-0445 (United States District Court for the Southern District of California)Case filed: February 21, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 28, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-34 SEC v. [read post]
