Search for: "In Re Moore"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 9:37 pm
The two claims raise different legal and factual issues, will not be supported or refuted by substantially the same evidence, and are not “logically related” in the sense described by the Supreme Court in Moore. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:09 am
“They’ve said they’re not interested in any change unless it’s extremely important,” says Knopf. [read post]
16 May 2017, 10:24 am
The majority (Huges + Moore) found a sufficient case-or-controversy, while the dissent (Wallach) would have found appellant’s covenant-not-to-sue sufficient to moot the dispute. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Moore v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:18 am
We grant that AmChem makes it much harder to settle cases through the middle ground -- class actions -- and we're not big fans of putting our clients into Chapter 11 to settle mass torts. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
Moore Northern District of Ohio at Akron 09a0022n.06 USA v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:24 am
We're sitting on the sidelines because even if this category takes off, and we get our piece of the pie, it doesn't add up," said Paul Moore, senior director of mobile product management for Fujitsu. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:15 am
The lawyers have been doing all this since 1993, as pointed out by network Chairman Tony Lathrop, a partner at Moore & Van Allen. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 1:53 pm
They're the ones who are willing to sit and listen to the blather and the grandstanding. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:20 am
In re Wyer, In re Klopfenstein and the recently decided Bruckelmyer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
We’re prepared to challenge the Trump administration’s policies at every level of government. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Moore, 18 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 1 (1820), a case involving the question of federal versus state power to regulate state militias. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
Without re-calculating the Guidelines or providing reasons, the district court denied the order. [read post]
23 May 2025, 10:20 am
"We're not having the taxpayers pay for this with direct funding, we're only have the taxpayers pay for this with indirect reductions in revenue" is sophistry.None of this will stop Republicans, of course. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:25 am
Along with the record number of nominees this year, we’re witnessing a rise in the boundary-pushers for big data, open government, and legal information. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm
The rest was in-house and outside counsel of the usual suspects (Apple and its allies on standard-essential patent policy).ACT's report on how it used PPP funds mentions all sorts of topics that sound like they're in the interest of small and large companies alike. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
" The self-consciously textualist style of the majority--written by an outspokenly liberal Justice--underscores a point Justice Kagan made in 2015 when she said "we're all textualists now. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:45 am
If you miss the deadline, you’re out of luck. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:49 am
Better to do it now before you're successfully sued. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
" That quotation is from a column that I wrote this past December commenting on Neil Gorsuch's performance during oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
