Search for: "People v. Ing"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 1,405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
After all, despite the court’s attempt to distinguish Wooley v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 12:56 pm
In routine encounters with law enforcement—like in traffic stops or home searches—state and local officials obtained information about the immigration status of people they saw, transmitted that information to federal immigration officials, and then detained people at ICE’s request until federal officials came to get them. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Not surprisingly, there are already a slew of reactions to the Court's landmark decision on Friday in Carpenter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
My favorite illustration of this comes in New Times, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:13 pm
See NIFLA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
(The case is Video Game Dealers Association v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:34 am
The Supreme Court has held that “willful” means “a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty” (US v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
These foundational issues have kept black robed people busy for centuries and will continue to do so. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
That's why I have filed patent applications for three inventions this year as opposed to just relying on copyright.Oracle v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm
Id. at *5-6 (citing Weedon v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
In one such alternative universe, people would ask to examine the evidence for and against claims, and they would have a healthy respect for uncertainty. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
” HB 20 prohibits social media platforms from “censor[ing] a user, a user’s expression or a user’s ability to receive the expression of another person” based on “viewpoint,” with carve-outs for federal law. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
To do so they attempt to distinguish Miami Herald v. [read post]
