Search for: "Sharpe v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
”The second patent under scrutiny was stated to be “[p]otentially … very important”, as it had been found to be essential for compliance with the 3G standard. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 5:52 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
On a practical reading, this certain appears to be what the decision states, despite assertions to the contrary at para 91. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On 2 and 3 March 2015, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will heard the appeal in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in on this again in R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 25 March 2011, Mrs Justice Sharp gave summary judgment for the defendant in the case of Bowker v RSPB [2011] EWHC 737 (QB). [read post]
The part of DOMA denying federal recognition to same-sex marriages that were valid in the state the couple lived in was struck down as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:35 pm
  The motion to enter a consent decree in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]