Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 1241 - 1260 of 44,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
(a)(5)) (count 5).The complaint alleged that in 2011 and 2012, Amit Marshall, the owner, president, and director of the Alliance School of Trucking (Alliance) obtained approval from the California State Approving Agency for Veterans Education for Alliance to provide non-college degree trucking programs to veterans eligible for benefits under the “Post-9/11 GI Bill” (38 U.S.C., Pt. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  (FWIW, all of his prior crimes seem far more serious than the current one.)There's a long discussion in the opinion about what's required for the crime of "attempted" indecent exposure and the split in courts of various states about whether it counts as indecent exposure if no one actually sees a penis. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
  That states, in toto:  "On page 5, footnote 7, beginning 'In raising this appeal, appellant' is deleted in its entirety. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Rightly so.I'm less confident that Justice Wiley is correct when he says "This mental state—requiring only proof that Canales voluntarily inserted his finger or penis into his stepdaughter’s vagina, without any further level of mental culpability—satisfies the presumption of mandatory culpability. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
“Just because people back then didn’t think it was irrational” for a state to pass anti-miscegenation laws, Barnett continued, “doesn’t mean that it was rational” under the actual text of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Most people assumed yes, but the Supreme Court said no in 1976 in Washington v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Washington, it actually applied the less demanding standard of United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am by Michael Froomkin
Plus, they say, they only sell tickets to people resident in the ticket’s state of origin. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Like I said (and as the Third Department states in this case), corporations are treated as people under the law in certain instances. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato cert amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm by Guest and Gray Law Firm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
How creative do officials have to get in depriving people of their rights until courts and the people say it has become downright bizarre? [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Venkat
McCraney" "MySpace Photo and Internet Gang Roster Evidence Improperly Admitted -- People v. [read post]