Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 6,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
This week, the Sixth Circuit weighed in on the intersection between unhelpful shortcuts and jury deliberations in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
First Circuit Rules Nonmember Workers Can’t Be Forced to Fund Union Lobbying Center Square – Bethany Blankley | Published: 2/4/2021 The U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
It states, without any equivocation, that there is "no precedent. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am
When their discussions soured, Defendant stated that he no longer wished to sell his interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Archibald v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
In our January 20 post, we explained: Right now, the Senate is not squarely faced with the question of whether a Section 3 disqualification against President Trump would bar him from running for the presidency in the future. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 12:01 pm
Judge Milan SmithUnited States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
They were on their own.Ants v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States (1944) and Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
Blount did not hold himself out as a representative of the United States government. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm
Hamburger insists otherwise, alluding to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:16 pm
Circuit’s holding in Penrod v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:12 pm
In Swales v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
For many who hold freedom of speech as a sacred right, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’s 1919 dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
