Search for: "The People v. English"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
The second of the Court’s trademark cases this week was Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Burson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
The new NDS has also added new provisions for the prevention and intervention of sexual abuse and assault in detention, accommodations for disabled detainees, and language access for people with limited English proficiency. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:46 pm
The People Making LawChapter 15. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
June 13, 2016, was the 50th anniversary of the famous Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Campagnolo S.R.L. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:07 am
The trouble was that such people do smoke in the house. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 8:08 pm
In Hunter et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
Soon people in Norway will be able to read these materials on their smartphones while riding the bus to work or drinking their morning coffee! [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
Oxford English Dictionaryplagiarism(? [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
A well-known case here is Lumley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) That seems to be what happened in Alkhafaji v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
The case is called Williams v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
- We are all connected, and should not see life via us v. them, leftist v. reactionary, and cops v. good people. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
The Supreme Court of Singapore was the first to refer a question of foreign law to a foreign court (Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) [2009] 2 SLR (R) 166), when it sought a determination of a question of English law. [read post]
